In 2001 The American Scholar published an excerpt from a talk given by English author Margaret Drabble. In the talk, Drabble claimed that "Our desire to conform is greater than our respect for objective facts." Using evidence from your reading, history, observation, personal experience, politics, etc., respond to this claim in your blog.
I agree with Drabble's claim. It is fact that, "our desire to conform is greater than our respect for objective facts."
When people believe in something, something they have been brought up to believe their whole life, they are loyal to it, they have an attachment to it. Take Christan believers for example. Their is no absolute proof that Jesus Christ rose from the dead, or that the whole bible in fact, is anything more than a story. We have proof in other creation stories, yet Christan's are indifferent to them. This does not make them wrong, it makes them faithful, and it does not make them weak, it makes them active in something they believe. It is Love.
People also use conforming as ways to identify themselves, to find an image, And in teen years people find it vital. I think that in order to find who you are, you must define it, people define it by conforming.
It is also one of my own theories, that people are naturally afraid. Afraid of loneliness or being alone. When they find something that fits their taste, They want to be apart of it, and they like the feeling of being apart of something.
When they find conformity, it is usually with something they love, and regardless of all the objective facts, these people, ignorant or not, will fight tooth and nail for the thing they love, the thing that is apart of them.
Please comment or respond to my post! I really want to know what you think. So I can learn from you. or Just make your own blog post. Thanks!!